The following is an excerpt from Stanford's F@H FAQ on how points are determined.
How do you determine how many points a work unit is worth? Before
putting out any new work unit, we benchmark it on a dedicated 2.8 GHz
Pentium 4 machine with SSE2 disabled (more specifically, as reported by
/proc/cpuinfo on linux: vendor_id : GenuineIntel, cpu family : 15,
model : 2, model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz, stepping :
9, cpu MHz : 2806.438, cache size : 512 KB). This machine runs linux,
so all WUs are benchmarked with the linux core.
We plug the results of this into the following formula:
points = 110 * (daysPerWU)
where daysPerWU is the number of days it took to complete the
unit. This equation was chosen to match the points for previous Gromacs
WUs to the previous point system. The upshot is that Tinker WUs will be
worth more than before we set up the new points (i.e. before April 2004)
Please note that the very concept of a reference machine will
mean that some WU benchmarking will vary from the performance on your
machine. Even between P4s, there are significant differences in
architectures over the years. Moreover, variations between FAH WUs can
also lead to differences in benchmarking points.
Our goal is consistency within a given definition of a reference
machine setup (described above), but beyond that the natural variation
from machine to machine and WU to WU will never allow any point system
to perfectly reflect what you get on your machine.
|